Post any interesting links in the comment section.
Local
State
- Gilbert bicyclist killed in northern Arizona
- Making Prescott more bike-friendly tops council agenda
- Full Frame, Suspension, and Thoughtfulness in Sedona
- Tempe’s transit center poised for business
National
- So a deer walks into a bicycle shop
- Twin Cities on the move with bike plans
- Students’ bicycle business model earns 2nd-place finish
- Jaguar shifts focus from four to two wheels with Tour de France bike
- Rise in San Francisco bike theft leads to “bait bikes”
- Despite history, train doesn’t join cyclists
- Guest: How Seattle can close the cycling gap with Copenhagen
- Bike Theft: Watch And Learn How Police Get Your Stolen Bicycle Back
- For Portland startup Project 529, fighting bike theft is just the beginning
- How can Portland get to 25 percent biking? New web game lets you try
- Will Self-Driving Cars Have Road Rage?
- Are Streetcars Mostly for Tourists?
- Bikes Are The New Mobile Meth Labs
- ‘Groundbreaking’ new study gives big thumbs up to U.S. protected bike lanes
- Protected Bike Lanes Aren’t Just Safer, They Can Also Increase Cycling
- The $1 Million USD 24K Gold Mountain Bike
International
Re: Bike ranch. From the comments: “The denial of this permit will do nothing to reduce the bike traffic that the residents were complaining about……”
What!?! Those noisy, smelly polluting bicycles and cyclists littering the roads with their trash.
One thing the ranch would likely do is increase the car traffic. I suppose residents would be completely happy with that. This is so illogical.
We should accept, though, that buffer zones are for just that….buffering. Bikes should ride in from further out.
There is a certain car perspective connected to having to be right next to where you want to be.